Stephen Vladeck of Texas Law Gives the 2022 Childress Memorial Lecture
10/28/2022
On October 28, 2022, the annual Richard J. Childress Memorial Lecture was held at Saint Louis University School of Law. This year鈥檚 lecture was organized by Professor Samuel Jordan and 3L Mikayla Lewison, the Childress Managing Editor for the Saint Louis University Law Journal.
This year鈥檚 topic, 鈥淭he Business of the Supreme Court: The Evolution and Devolution of the Supreme Court's Docket,鈥� came after a groundbreaking summer in the wake of multiple U.S. Supreme Court decisions. This year鈥檚 annual Childress Lecture was delivered by Professor Stephen Vladeck, the Charles Alan Wright Chair in Federal Courts at The University of Texas School of Law and provided both a historical introduction to and a modern reassessment of the shape and size of the Supreme Court鈥檚 docket.
On the lecture topic, Lewison said that they chose to discuss the actions Supreme
Court because they wanted to cover something 鈥榯imely and impactful鈥�, where the discussion
surrounding the topic could promote education and change. The topic on the future
of the Court and the debate on legitimacy is widely examined in the law community,
including by our own Prof. Chad Flanders on SLU LAW Summations. This year鈥檚 lecture allowed for many legal scholars to come together to address
the issue. Professor Vladeck was asked to speak based on his work surrounding the
topic, including his forthcoming book, The Shadow Docket: How the Supreme Court Uses Stealth Rulings to Amass Power and Undermine
the Republic.
In his keynote address, Professor Vladeck said: 鈥淭o put the matter simply, if we take a more holistic look at the Court as an institution, we see an even greater legitimacy crisis than the justices have been publicly debating all summer.鈥� He went on to explain that the legitimacy crisis he sees has less sharp of a partisan or ideological balance. 鈥淔or whatever reason, we have come to see the court as a sum of its larger decisions, and to assume that all of the most important questions about the Court as an institution can be answered.鈥� Professor Vladeck鈥檚 lecture ended with how change can be brought forth. 鈥淲e need a Court. We need an anti-majoritarian, a counter majoritarian body that can stand up to the tyrannies of the majority, perhaps now more than ever. Indeed, in the near future, we may need a legitimate court.鈥� Following the keynote, the Childress lecture featured three additional panels.
The first panel titled 鈥淚ntricacies of the Court,鈥� featured Morgan Hazelton (Saint Louis University), Ben Johnson (Penn State University), and Tejas Narechania (University of California 鈥� Berkeley). This panel focused on the Court鈥檚 current operating procedure, all its problems, and what the future could look like. On what the future could be, Dr. Hazelton said, 鈥淪hould we protect the court as is? If we are to make changes what would those be? We need more data, and we need more transparency about the Court.鈥�
The second panel,, 鈥淚nterrelationships of the Court,鈥� included Josh Chafetz (Georgetown University), Daniel Epps (Washington University in St. Louis), and Jennifer Mascott (George Mason University). This panel focused on the institution of the Court and the relationship between the members of the Court and that institution.
The final panel , titled 鈥淐overing the Court,鈥� included Ariane de Vogue (CNN), Amy Howe (Scotusblog), and Kate Shaw (Cardozo & ABC News). This panel focused on the relationship with media and the Court, as with their role in making information accessible. As highlighted by de Vogue during the panel: 鈥淩ight here you are seeing a panel of people that have really made this much more digestible for the majority of people.鈥�
The Childress Lecture is named in honor of former Dean Richard J. Childress, who held the position from 1969 to 1979, to commemorate and honor his contributions to the law school.
Lecture and panel videos and speaker bios
More information about the Saint Louis University Law Journal